Texas Companies Would Prefer to be Sued for Medical Malpractice?

side note: This story really hits home how  successful medical malpractice tort reform has been in Texas. In this case, the provider of laser hair removal is arguing that a claim against it should be considered “medical malpractice” and not an ordinary claim of negligence. Why would the provider of laser hair removal WANT to be charged with a claim of medical malpractice? Because in Texas, medical malpractice claims carry many more stringent procedural requirements — like producing an expert report within 120 days of filing a claim — than a normal negligence claim. Crazy story, isn’t it?

by Andrew Skemp
InjuryBoard.com

Texas Courts of Appeals have issued two conflicting opinions in recent weeks dealing with whether laser hair removal is an ordinary claim for negligence or medical malpractice. The distinction is significant in Texas because of the stringent procedural requirements for Plaintiffs in bringing a medical malpractice case, including producing an expert report within 120 days of filing a petition.

continue reading

You may also like

Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more
athenahealth Helps Massachusetts Medical Providers Avert Insurance Claim Denials Worth Nearly $100 Million in 2006
Read more

Recent Posts

Rhode Island Suicide Liability: Key Lessons from Almonte v. Kurl

5 Common Mistakes That Increase Medical Malpractice Insurance Cost

What Every Physician Should Know About Claims-Made vs. Occurrence Policies

Popular Posts

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

Louisiana COVID Immunity Ruling: The Impact on Healthcare Liability

North Carolina Supreme Court Removes Precedent Shielding Nurses from Medical Liability Claims

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote