Ky. Gov Wants Compromise on Malpractice


In a blunt assessment to fellow doctors, Gov. Ernie Fletcher said Monday that chances of limiting pain-and-suffering damages in medical malpractice cases are bleak because of resistance from some state lawmakers. The governor expressed a willingness to compromise if he wins another term.

Speaking at a Kentucky Medical Association meeting, Fletcher said doctors should settle for another version featuring a pretrial dispute resolution process aimed at reducing “frivolous” malpractice suits.

Specifically, he said independent boards – possibly consisting of doctors and patient advocates – would review malpractice filings, with their findings admissible in court.

The review would not preclude a right to jury trial.

“I’m willing to compromise,” Fletcher said after his speech.

The Republican governor said he shared the KMA’s disappointment that proposed constitutional amendments on medical malpractice have died in recent legislative sessions.

Had past proposals reached the ballot and won voter approval, lawmakers could have then limited pain-and-suffering and punitive awards to no lower than $250,000 each.

There would have been no limit on economic damages for lost wages and medical costs.

“I hate to say this, until we change the makeup of the House, we’re not going to be able to get the $250,000 limit on non-economic damages,” Fletcher told doctors.

Governors have no veto power over proposed constitutional amendments, but can exert their influence with state lawmakers in trying to get measures on the ballot, or to block such proposals.

Republican state Rep. Bob DeWeese of Louisville, a retired surgeon attending the KMA meeting, said it was the first time he heard Fletcher indicate a willingness to drop proposed caps on non-economic damages.

DeWeese said he thought doctors would accept the compromise,

DeWeese, however, wasn’t optimistic that Fletcher’s suggestion would jump-start the issue. DeWeese said he offered a similar compromise two years ago that failed to salvage a proposed constitutional amendment.

Fletcher, who is being challenged by Democrat Steve Beshear in the Nov. 6 election, also spoke about requiring insurance companies to justify their medical malpractice premiums – something Beshear also supports.

Beshear said he wants to bring all sides of the medical malpractice issue together for discussions, adding that he’s “committed to finding solutions to address this issue.”

Supporters of limiting non-economic damages say it’s needed to halt rising malpractice insurance rates forcing some doctors to quit doing high-risk procedures or leave for states where insurance rates are lower.

Critics say the limits would not guarantee that insurance rates drop or stabilize.
see original

You may also like

Legislative panel approves medical malpractice bill
Read more
Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more

Recent Posts

Understanding Exclusions in Your Medical Malpractice Insurance

Medical Malpractice Insurance Tips: Risk Management and Ongoing Support

Policy Limits in Medical Malpractice Insurance: A Doctor’s Guide

Popular Posts

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

2022 Medical Malpractice Insurance Rates: What the data tells us

Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote