Illinois Supreme Court Considers Pattern Jury Instruction for Medical Malpractice Cases

Default image

side note: Could this be a judicial “make good”? After neutering the majority of Illinois’ medical malpractice tort reforms when it deemed the state’s cap on non-economic damages unconstitutional two years ago, Illinois’ highest court more clearly defined the role of expert testimony in medical professional liability lawsuits this month. The question is whether this clarification of Illinois’ pattern jury instructions will have any affect on the risk exposure of the state’s healthcare community.

Comprehensive Guide to Medical Malpractice Insurance

Selecting the right malpractice insurance is key for a long, successful career. Read our “Ultimate Guide to Medical Malpractice Insurance” and let us help you gain the best protection.

Read the Ultimate Guide

The Illinois Supreme Court addressed an interesting issue earlier this month: whether the Illinois Pattern Jury Instructions on the standard of care for professional negligence correctly stated the law in Illinois. This issue was considered in Studt v. Sherman Health Systems, 2011 WL 2409897.

continue reading

Discover More about Coverage in Illinois

Related Posts

Why Malpractice Insurance Is So Expensive for Surgeons (And How to Navigate It)
Read more
Telemedicine and Malpractice Insurance: Are You Fully Covered?
Read more
meet-two-top-agents-cunningham
Understanding Tail Coverage: Is It Worth the Investment for Physicians?
Read more

Recent Posts

Why Malpractice Insurance Is So Expensive for Surgeons (And How to Navigate It)
Read more
Telemedicine and Malpractice Insurance: Are You Fully Covered?
Read more
meet-two-top-agents-cunningham
Understanding Tail Coverage: Is It Worth the Investment for Physicians?
Read more

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote