Blue Cross, Highmark paying agency’s advisers

By Jane M. Von Bergen

A hearing on the proposed Independence Blue Cross and Highmark Inc. merger took an unexpected twist in Harrisburg yesterday.

Instead of focusing on the merger, which would create the largest health insurer in the state, it was all about how much the Insurance Department’s consultants were being paid – and, more surprising, who was paying them.

Independence Blue Cross, of Philadelphia, and Highmark, of Pittsburgh, are not only paying for their own consultants, but are also footing the bill for the department’s consultants.

The Insurance Department will decide on the merger.

State Sen. Donald White, who called the hearing, said he was confused by the payment arrangement.

“This is almost like the fox guarding the chicken coop,” said White, a Republican, who is chairman of the Senate’s Insurance and Banking Committee. “I don’t understand how we get an objective opinion when the burden is being paid by the parties that have a vested interest in this.”

The consultants and acting Insurance Department chairman Joel Ario assured White that the arrangement was standard around the nation.

Martin Alderson Smith, senior managing director of the consultant Blackstone Group L.P., said Blackstone would earn $200,000 a month for 10 months, and $125,000 monthly after that from the insurance companies for advising the state. A final report would cost an additional $750,000.

James Langenfeld, director of LECG L.L.C., a California economic-consulting group, could not remember the exact amount, but LECG estimated that its services to the department would cost the insurers $725,000, according to an Insurance Department filing.

Smith and Langenfeld had been expected to testify on how they planned to analyze the merger.

Ario said that even though the insurers would foot the bill, they would have no influence on the consultants.

He and Smith described how some insurers seeking state approval for mergers were turned down and still had to pay. The insurers “got a result that they were distinctly unhappy with,” Ario said.

He said the state had to have its own top-notch consultants to match Independence and Highmark’s.

Still, he said, the fees raised his eyebrows. “It made me think maybe I’m in the wrong job here,” he joked.

Editor’s Note: This originally appeared on, but was removed. We will leave it on our site for archiving purposes. Please reach out to us on our Contact Us page if you have any questions.

You may also like

Legislative panel approves medical malpractice bill
Read more
Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more

Recent Posts

Connecticut Supreme Court Narrows Scope of Physicians’ Immunity from Civil Liability During COVID

Rate of ‘Serious Discipline’ of Physicians by State Medical Boards Drops from Previous Benchmark

New York Lawmakers Again Vote to Update Wrongful Death Statute in Way Doctors Say Would Increase Damages, Harm Safety Net Care

Popular Posts

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

Arizona Court Decisions Affirm Two Medical Professional Liability Reform Laws

2022 Medical Malpractice Insurance Rates: What the data tells us

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote