Opinion: Single payer plan may help medical costs


In an Aug. 16 letter, Mark Kriss wrote of the necessity of tort reform in reducing the cost of health care. Unfortunately, Mr. Kriss’ claims that regulating tort awards will reduce medical costs is at odds with reality. Both the cost of malpractice insurance and the payouts in malpractice cases have remained essentially constant as a fraction of health care spending in the United States. What’s more, the states that have enacted various sorts of tort reform have not seen a significant decrease in malpractice insurance costs. This information is available to anyone willing to go on Google.

Yes, health care premiums are skyrocketing, but tort reform will not address the real causes, which are drug costs, inefficiency in the insurance system and huge insurance company profits.

If Mr. Kriss really wants to reduce health care cost for all of us he would be much better advised to support some variety of single-payer plan, which can be observed at work in every other major Western nation. A single-payer plan won’t be perfect, but there’s a lot of room for improvement between “perfect” and where we are now.

Mike Jones


see original

You may also like

Legislative panel approves medical malpractice bill
Read more
Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more

Recent Posts

The difference between claims made and occurrence coverage for doctors.

What is a physician’s loss history, and how does it affect malpractice insurance prices?

What is Malpractice Tail Coverage? What options are available?

Popular Posts

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

Oregon Supreme Court Strikes Down Noneconomic Damage Cap

New Report: Best and Worst States for Doctors

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote