New Law Specifies Physicians' Non-Compete Agreement Requirements

http://www.ogletreedeakins.com

On June 21, Governor Phil Bredesen signed House Bill 240/Senate Bill 1688, which was the General Assembly’s response to a 2005 case in which the Tennessee Supreme Court declined to enforce a non-compete provision in an employment contract between a physician and a clinic. In Murfreesboro Medical Clinic, P.A. v. Udom, the state’s highest court held that, except for restrictions specifically provided for by Tennessee’s corporate practice of medicine statute, “covenants not to compete are unenforceable against physicians.�

The new law defines the non-compete restrictions an employer may place on its employed or contracted health care providers. To be considered reasonable, the restriction must be in writing and may not last longer than two years. The new law also includes specific provisions for geographically restricting competition of former employees. According to another provision, non-compete restrictions will not be binding on a health care provider who has been employed by, or under contract with, the employing or contracting entity for at least six years.

The statute applies to podiatrists, chiropractors, dentists, optometrists, psychologists and those licensed in the practice of medicine and surgery. It does not, however, apply to radiologists and providers who specialize in the practice of emergency medicine. The new legislation takes effect on January 1, 2008. For a copy of the new law, visit
see original

You may also like

Legislative panel approves medical malpractice bill
Read more
Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more

Recent Posts

ATRF Publishes Annual ‘Judicial Hellhole Report,’ Medical Professional Liability Again Plays Determining Role

New Mexico Makes Last-Minute Tweaks to New Medical Malpractice Act, Averts Medical Liability Insurance Crisis

California Hospitalist Wants Federal Court to Declare Disciplinary Hearings Unconstitutional

Popular Posts

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

2022 Medical Malpractice Insurance Rates: What the data tells us

New Report: Best and Worst States for Doctors

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote