Judge-Directed Negotiations Expedite Malpractice Cases

side note: Here is a fantastic example of a successful medical malpractice program funded by the Patient Protection & Affordable Care Act. The pilot program is intended to streamline medical professional liability court cases. In a “judge-directed negotiation,” a judge with medical liability experience helps broker a settlement satisfactory to both parties, while cutting down the cost of a trial, which can stretch over the course of years and cost hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal expenses. Judging by the successes outlined in the article below, this might be a more effective and fair option to capping damages.

In Justice Douglas E. McKeon’s fluorescent-lighted chambers in the Bronx, a new way of handling medical malpractice suits was on full, and sometimes gruesome, display. Around a polished wood table, lawyers haggled over the price for a lost nose ($300,000) and the missing tip of a finger ($50,000).

continue reading

You may also like

Legislative panel approves medical malpractice bill
Read more
Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more

Recent Posts

Malpractice Insurance 101: Reputation Protection

Filed Ballot Initiatives Ask Colorado Voters to Decide Medical Malpractice Rules, Damage Cap

Florida Looks to Impose Noneconomic Damage Caps, End ‘Free Kill’ Law

Popular Posts

Malpractice Insurance 101: Reputation Protection

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

Medical review panels in Louisiana are not allowed to take into account COVID immunity

Arizona Court Decisions Affirm Two Medical Professional Liability Reform Laws

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote