Alabama Supreme Court removes physician from malpractice case due to statute of limitations

side note: Caps on non-economic damages is the holy grail of tort reform, but it is just one of several reforms that have an effect on medical malpractice insurance premiums. Another effective tort reform is a strong statute of limitations. In this article, the Alabama Supreme Court rules that a physician was not identified in time for a medical malpractice lawsuit, and the physician was excused from the case because of the state’s statute of limitations.

MONTGOMERY — The Alabama Supreme Court has ruled that a Scottsboro physician was not identified in time in a medical malpractice suit for him to continue to be a defendant in the case.

continue reading

You may also like

Legislative panel approves medical malpractice bill
Read more
Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more

Recent Posts

Medical review panels in Louisiana are not allowed to take into account COVID immunity

By fixing the damage cap, New Mexico managed to prevent a crisis in medical malpractice insurance

ATRF Publishes Annual ‘Judicial Hellholes’ Report, Medical Professional Liability Again Plays Determining Role

Popular Posts

2022 Medical Malpractice Insurance Rates: What the data tells us

Global Center for Medical Innovation launches

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote