Abortion ruling

Carlos T. Mock, MD
http://newsblogs.chicagotribune.com
Chicago

This is in response to “Abortion law is upheld; In 5-4 ruling, justices OK ban on controversial procedure” (Page 1, April 19).

As a board-certified obstetrician-gynecologist, I am deeply troubled by the Supreme Court’s ruling, in which justices approved a ban on partial-birth abortion without taking into consideration the health of the mother.

As a physician who took the Hippocratic oath, I am sworn to do no harm. In difficult situations in which I’ve had to choose between the health of the baby vs. the mother’s, the most important factor to consider is the health of the woman. I have only practiced partial-birth abortions on dead fetuses, when the risk of a severely ill mother (diabetic or hypertensive) would endanger her life if subjected to Cesarean section.

The worst mistake this country can do is to legislate the practice of medicine. Medicine should be regulated by our respective medical associations. Groups like the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists argue that depriving physicians of this option would create real danger.

Difficult ethical choices should be left to be decided between the physician and his patients. This is precisely an area where less government is the best choice.

You may also like

Legislative panel approves medical malpractice bill
Read more
Urgent-care centers: Illinois numbers grow as time-pressed families seek low-cost option to ERs
Read more
Global Center for Medical Innovation launches
Read more

Recent Posts

The difference between claims made and occurrence coverage for doctors.

What is a physician’s loss history, and how does it affect malpractice insurance prices?

What is Malpractice Tail Coverage? What options are available?

Popular Posts

PIAA 2017: Current Trends & Future Concerns

Oregon Supreme Court Strikes Down Noneconomic Damage Cap

New Report: Best and Worst States for Doctors

Start Your Custom Quote Process™

Request a free quote